About Us Advertise Careers Contact Us Privacy Policy Community Guidelines
Locating… 13°C English WhatsApp Alerts Email Alerts
BREAKING NEWS
Bangladesh Beat Sri Lanka 4-0 In SAFF Championship 2026 | Bangladesh raise the rafters with scintillating 4-0 win - The Daily Star Live Coverage: Starship Flight 15 attempts to recover full vehicle in double launch pad catch Water-based batteries store more energy in iodine with new electrolyte design Travel: Sri Lanka is one of the most special islands on Planet Earth - The Sunday Post Heat waves are threatening Europe's power supplies, researchers warn Commercial Space Federation Welcomes CesiumAstro as a New Associate Member AI helps digital humans move more naturally as they speak EU plan for cloud and AI falls short on digital autonomy EHang Flies Sri Lanka's First Human-Carrying eVTOL in Colombo - DroneXL Starship flight 15 powers to orbit—setting up a possible catch on Saturday
SRI LANKA NEWS

What is ‘triumvirate’? Major blow to Trump as judge rejects trio named to replace Alina Habba | Hindustan Times - Hindustan Times

Lanka Hit News • Mar 10, 2026 · 8mo ago • 4 min read
Share:

A federal judge has delivered a major setback to the administration of Donald Trump by ruling that the three prosecutors appointed to lead the US attorney’s office in New Jersey were appointed illegally.

The three lawyers had been put in charge after Alina Habba , Trump’s former personal lawyer stepped down from the position. Courts had earlier ruled that Habba could not continue in the role because she had never received the required Senate confirmation.

US District Judge Matthew Brann has ruled that Attorney General Pam Bondi did not have the authority to appoint three lawyers to run the office together.

After Habba’s resignation , Bondi split the leadership of the New Jersey US attorney’s office among Justice Department lawyers Philip Lamparello, Jordan Fox and Ari Fontecchio. The judge described this as an unusual leadership arrangement.

Brann criticized the administration for trying to bypass the normal confirmation process.

“On the [government’s] reading, the president would have had no need ever to seek the Senate’s advice and consent for his [US attorney] appointments,” Brann wrote, as per The Guardian.

“Whenever there was a fair prospect of the Senate’s rejecting his preferred nominee, the president could have appointed that individual unilaterally … to serve ‘ad infinitum’. It is unthinkable that such an obvious means for the executive to expand its power would have been overlooked by Congress.”

The judge referred to the three-person leadership as a “triumvirate.”

The term simply means a group of three people who share power or leadership over an organization or position that is usually held by one person.

In this case, Bondi split the responsibilities of the New Jersey US attorney’s office among three lawyers instead of appointing a single confirmed leader.

Brann said she had no legal authority to divide the position this way in order to avoid Senate approval.

The case was filed by several criminal defendants who argued that their cases should be dismissed because the prosecutors handling them were serving illegally.

Judge Matthew Brann did not immediately remove the three officials or dismiss the cases. However, he warned that continuing with leaders who were not properly confirmed could create serious legal problems for many prosecutions.

“Why does the fate of thousands of criminal prosecutions in this district potentially rest on the legitimacy of an unprecedented and byzantine leadership structure?” the judge wrote.

“The government tells us: ‘the president doesn’t like that he cannot simply appoint whomever he wants’.”

Brann also warned that if the administration continues with the appointments then it could lead to dismissed cases or overturned convictions. He paused his ruling to allow the Justice Department to appeal but said the pause does not make the appointments lawful.

“However, my reasoning makes clear that a stay cannot validate an unlawful appointment. If the Government chooses to leave the triumvirate in place, it does so at its own risk,” he wrote.

After the ruling, Alina Habba who now serves as a senior adviser to Pam Bondi has strongly criticized the decision on social media.

She wrote that, “Another ridiculous ruling from Judge Brann.”

“Judges may continue to try [to] stop President Trump from carrying out what the American people voted for, but we will not be deterred. The unconstitutionality of this complete overreach into the executive branch, time and time again, will not succeed. They would rather have no US Attorney than safety for the people of [New Jersey]”, she added.

The ruling has raised serious questions about how the New Jersey US attorney’s office is being run and whether the cases handled under the three-person leadership could face legal challenges.

Khushi Arora is a Content Producer at Hindustan Times, where she writes for the US Desk, covering everything happening in the United States, while maintaining quality and delivering impactful stories across all beats. She previously worked at Zee News for over a year where she explored multiple beats including News Desk, Education and Lifestyle. With a background in English Literature, Khushi blends sharp research with thoughtful storytelling, shaping stories that go beyond headlines and bring clarity and credibility to every piece she writes. Beyond the newsroom, she enjoys reading, watching cinema and loves having long conversations about books, films and everything in between. Read More

Join the Conversation